<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Secure Development on James Jardine</title><link>https://jamesgaryjardine.com/tags/secure-development/</link><description>Recent content in Secure Development on James Jardine</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 06:49:15 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://jamesgaryjardine.com/tags/secure-development/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>AI: Could you or should you?</title><link>https://jamesgaryjardine.com/ai-could-you-or-should-you/</link><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 06:49:15 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://jamesgaryjardine.com/ai-could-you-or-should-you/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;What can you do with AI?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That is the question that so many companies and individuals have been asking over the past year. Companies are directing their employees to find every way possible to use AI. Annual goals and strategies are focused on AI implementations.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Versioning the SDLC to Indicate Security Level</title><link>https://jamesgaryjardine.com/versioning-the-sdlc-to-indicate-security-level/</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2015 20:09:58 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://jamesgaryjardine.com/versioning-the-sdlc-to-indicate-security-level/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I recently saw a tweet that mentioned how trending SecDevOps is becoming. For those that don’t know, that is the “secure” devops, or shall I say devops with security injected. It really got me thinking about not only devops, but also the Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC). We keep saying security can’t be bolted on and that it needs to be built in, yet we keep bolting it on.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>